SAP Note 10283 - Inconsistencies between T162 and T162T.

Symptom

Inconsistencies between field selection keys (T162) and their
descriptions (T162T).

Cause and prerequisites

Some table entries missing in standard system.

Solution

As the tables can also be maintained by customers via SM31, not all
errors are necessarily stem from the SAP side. However, the following
entries in table T162T are missing in the system supplied by us:

PT3L Subcontracting item, scheduling agreement
PT5A 3rd.-party item RFQ
PT5B 3rd.-party item requisition
PT5F 3rd.-party item purchase order
PT5L 3rd.-party item scheduling agreement

However, if an entry is missing in table T162, the customer should add
one as required.

In Rel. 3.0, T162 and T162T will be synchronized again.

Key word: T162 T162T